Bailey and Dynarski cited in piece on why quality education should be a "civil and moral right"
Kalousova and Burgard find credit card debt increases likelihood of foregoing medical care
Arline Geronimus wins Excellence in Research Award from School of Public Health
Yu Xie to give DBASSE's David Lecture April 30, 2013 on "Is American Science in Decline?"
U-M grad programs do well in latest USN&WR "Best" rankings
Sheldon Danziger named president of Russell Sage Foundation
Back in September
Rebecca Thornton, Susan Godlonton and Alister Munthali
11/01/2010, at noon in room 6050 ISR-Thompson.
Despite the fact that male circumcision has been shown to significantly lower the transmission rate of HIV, many countries have been slow at adopting male circumcision as a core HIV prevention strategy. One concern about disseminating the information about male circumcision and HIV is that circumcised men may engage in riskier sex after learning that they are less at risk. Among a sample of approximately 900 circumcised and 300 un-circumcised men living in rural Malawi, we randomly disseminated the information about HIV transmission risk and male circumcision by village. We measure the behavioral response to learning this information among circumcised and uncircumcised men. We find no evidence of dis-inhibition among circumcised men in the treatment group immediately after the information campaign or one year later as measured by condom purchases and self-reported sexual behavior. Uncircumcised men in the treatment group significantly increase the likelihood of purchasing condoms immediately after the information intervention by approximately 10 percentage points and this is weakly persistent after one year. Consistent with this, we present evidence that uncircumcised men who learn about HIV and circumcision decreased risky sexual behavior.