Home > Events & News > Brown Bag Schedule . Archive

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Axinn says data show incidents of sexual assault start at 'very young age'

Miech on 'generational forgetting' about drug-use dangers

Impacts of H-1B visas: Lower prices and higher production - or lower wages and higher profits?

More News

Highlights

Call for papers: Conference on computational social science, April 2017, U-M

Sioban Harlow honored with 2017 Sarah Goddard Power Award for commitment to women's health

Post-doc fellowship in computational social science for summer or fall 2017, U-Penn

ICPSR Summer Program scholarships to support training in statistics, quantitative methods, research design, and data analysis

More Highlights

Next Brown Bag

Mon, Feb 13, 2017, noon:
Daniel Almirall, "Getting SMART about adaptive interventions"

psc brown bag iconGetting what you can, and no more, from administrative data: Matching and omitted variable sensitivity for quasiexperiments in K-12 education

Ben Hansen (PSC, U of M)

11/04/2013, at noon in room 6050 ISR-Thompson.

Archived video

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2002 increased the quantity of education data that states collect and store, and subsequent state and federal initiatives have improved the quality of state K-12 databases. The data systems that result remain imperfect and incomplete, to be sure, but they beg to be used -- for example, to assess educational programs and policies. Because the data are strictly regulated by FERPA, however, assessments produced from them generally settle for aggregated, unadjusted measures, or are time-consuming and expensive to produce.

The talk describes statistical methods and procedures developed for a Gates-funded initiative, the Evaluation Engine, that aims to remedy this situation by making available to state education agencies and school districts fast, automated comparisons of program participants to comparison subjects matched to them within state databases. Novelties of the method include the manner of its use of propensity scores; specially constructed matching variables describing students' educational contexts; and its approach to analysis of key conclusions' sensitivity to limitations of the data system as a basis for matching. The sensitivity analysis culminates in an easy-to-understand visual display, and promises to include many more stakeholders than before in quantitatively specific deliberations about potential impacts of unmeasured confounding.


  View All