<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PSC Information &#187; Funding News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=14" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv</link>
	<description>Information Sharing at the UM Population Studies Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s &#8220;NSF&#8221; Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=3192</link>
		<comments>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=3192#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 20:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lisan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=3192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans are trying to implement serious changes to the evaluation and funding of NSF science [here and here].
Canada is perhaps a bit further down this road. Here&#8217;s the latest on the decision to fund research that has industry applications rather than basic science.
When science goes silent
Jonathan Gatehouse &#124; MacLean&#8217;s
May 3, 2013
This article touches on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3192</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Science is not Alone [NSF]</title>
		<link>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=3053</link>
		<comments>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=3053#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lisan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=3053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are a series of articles on the potential changes to how NSF projects are reviewed and funded. They are in chronological order.  
The first is the draft of the High Quality Research Act.  It takes some time before that name shows up in an article.
High Quality Research Research Act: [Discussion Draft]
April [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3053</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War on Science: Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2969</link>
		<comments>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2969#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lisan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Political Science has had its major funding source cut for the remainder of this fiscal year [see synopsis] and Congressional Republicans want to tinker with the American Community Survey (ACS) or completely cut its funding [see synopsis], Canada&#8217;s experience with governmental interference into scientific research is more drastic. The trend has been to fund [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2969</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2963</link>
		<comments>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2963#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lisan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The field of Political Science has been hit hard by an amendment to the Continuing Approriations Act of 2013, which pretty much axes the NSF political science funding mechanism.  The money remains with NSF rather than being shifted to the National Cancer Institute and political science research can still be funded, but only if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2963</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Sequestration Cuts for Statistical Agencies</title>
		<link>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2919</link>
		<comments>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2919#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lisan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?p=2919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sequestration Cuts’ Impact on Statistical Agencies
Steve Pierson &#124; The Census Project Blog
February 19, 2014
This is up-to-date information on selected statistical agencies, primarily the Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, at the end of the post are links to impacts on NIH and NSF.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pscinfoserv/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2919</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>