Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Thompson says America must "unchoose" policies that have led to mass incarceration

Axinn says new data on campus rape will "allow students to see for themselves the full extent of this problem"

Frey says white population is growing in Detroit and other large cities


Susan Murphy to speak at U-M kickoff for data science initiative, Oct 6, Rackham

Andrew Goodman-Bacon, former trainee, wins 2015 Nevins Prize for best dissertation in economic history

Deirdre Bloome wins ASA award for work on racial inequality and intergenerational transmission

Bob Willis awarded 2015 Jacob Mincer Award for Lifetime Contributions to the Field of Labor Economics

Next Brown Bag

Monday, Oct 12 at noon, 6050 ISR
Joe Grengs: Policy & planning for transportation equity

Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questions

Publication Abstract

Presser, S., Mick P. Couper, J.T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, J.M. Rothgeb, and Eleanor Singer. 2004. "Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questions." Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1): 109-130.

A growing awareness of conventional pretesting's drawbacks has led to two interrelated changes. First, there has been a subtle shift in the goals of testing, from an exclusive focus on identifying and fixing overt problems experienced by interviewers and respondents to a broader concern for improving data quality so that measurements meet a survey's objectives. Second, new testing methods have been developed or adapted from other uses. The development of these methods raises issues of how they might best be used in combination, as well as whether they in fact lead to improvements in survey measurement. Four general recommendations seem particularly important to us for advancing questionnaire testing and evaluation. These involve: 1. the connection between problem identification and measurement error, 2. the impact of testing methods on survey costs, 3. the role of basic research and theory in guiding the repair of question flaws, and 4. the development of a data base to facilitate cumulative knowledge.

DOI:10.1093/poq/nfh008 (Full Text)

Licensed Access Link

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next