Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Burgard and Seelye find job insecurity linked to psychological distress among workers in later years

Former PSC trainee Jay Borchert parlays past incarceration and doctoral degree into pursuing better treatment of inmates

Inglehart says shaky job market for millennials has contributed to their disaffection

More News

Highlights

Savolainen wins Outstanding Contribution Award for study of how employment affects recidivism among past criminal offenders

Giving Blueday at ISR focuses on investing in the next generation of social scientists

Pfeffer and Schoeni cover the economic and social dimensions of wealth inequality in this special issue

PRB Policy Communication Training Program for PhD students in demography, reproductive health, population health

More Highlights

Next Brown Bag

Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at noon:
H. Luke Shaefer

Lauren Nicholas photo

Does Managed Care Reduce Federal Spending? Evidence from Medicare

Publication Abstract

Download PDF versionNicholas, Lauren. 2009. "Does Managed Care Reduce Federal Spending? Evidence from Medicare." PSC Research Report No. 09-671. February 2009.

Although Medicare Managed Care (MMC) was introduced as a way to reduce costs, the effect of the program on total Medicare spending is unknown. Current literature has focused on three conflicting sets of findings including spillover effects from managed care which reduce total Medicare spending and positive selection into managed care and overpayments to managed care plans relative to Fee-for-Service (FFS) spending, which increase spending. This research reconciles these results by examining the effects of Medicare managed care penetration on total county-level Medicare spending for elderly beneficiaries from 1999 - 2004. Using an instrumental variables approach, I find that a one percentage point increase in Medicare managed care penetration increases total county Medicare spending by 1.1 percent, $2.6 billion in 2004 dollars. There is no evidence of cost-reducing spillovers from MMC penetration to FFS. Increases in FFS spending likely caused by positive selection into MMC account for 40 percent of the increase in costs, the remainder is built in by federal payment policy to MMC plans.

Country of focus: United States of America.

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next