Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Levy says ACA has helped increase rates of insured, but rates still lowest among poor

Bruch reveals key decision criteria in making first cuts on dating sites

Murphy on extending health support via a smart phone and JITAI

More News

Highlights

U-M ranked #4 in USN&WR's top public universities

Frey's new report explores how the changing US electorate could shape the next 5 presidential elections, 2016 to 2032

U-M's Data Science Initiative offers expanded consulting services via CSCAR

Elizabeth Bruch promoted to Associate Professor

Next Brown Bag

Mon, Sept 19 at noon:
Paradox of Unintended Pregnancy, Jennifer Barber

Ben Hansen photo

Attributing Effects to a Cluster-Randomized Get-Out-the-Vote Campaign

Publication Abstract

Hansen, Ben, and J. Bowers. 2009. "Attributing Effects to a Cluster-Randomized Get-Out-the-Vote Campaign." Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104(487): 873-885.

Early in the twentieth century, Fisher and Neyman demonstrated how to infer effects of agricultural interventions using only the very weakest of assumptions, by randomly varying which plots were to be manipulated. Although the methods permitted uncontrolled variation between experimental units. the), required strict control over assignment of interventions; this hindered their application to field studies With human subjects, who ordinarily could not be compelled to comply with experimenters' instructions. In 1996, however, Angrist, Imbens. and Rubin showed that inferences from randomized studies could accommodate noncompliance without significant strengthening of assumptions. Political scientists A. Gerber and D. Green responded quickly, fielding a randomized study of voter turnout campaigns in the November 1998 general election. Noncontacts and refusals were frequent. but Gerber and Green analyzed their data in the style of Angrist et A.. avoiding the need to model nonresponse. They did use models for other purposes: to address complexities of the randomization schemed to permit heterogeneity among voters and campaigners; to account for deviations from experimental protocol: and to take advantage of highly informative covariates. Although the added assumptions seemed straightforward and unassailable. a later analysis by Imai found them to be at odds with Gerber and Green's data. Using a different model, he reaches the very opposite of Gerber and Green's central conclusion about getting out the vote. This article shows that neither of the models are necessary, addressing all of the complications of Gerber and Green's Study using methods in the tradition of Fisher and Neyman. To do this, it merges recent developments in randomization-based inference for comparative Studies with somewhat older development,., in design-based analysis of sample surveys. The method involves regression. but large-sample analysis and simulations demonstrate its lack of dependence on regression assumptions. Its substantive results have consequences both for the design of campaigns to increase voter participation and for theories of political behavior more generally

DOI:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap06589 (Full Text)

Country of focus: United States of America.

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next