Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Stafford says exiting down stock market worsened position of low-income households

Bailey's work cited on growing income disparities in college enrollment and graduation

Murphy says mobile sensor data will allow adaptive interventions for maximizing healthy outcomes

Highlights

PSC Fall 2014 Newsletter now available

Martha Bailey and Nicolas Duquette win Cole Prize for article on War on Poverty

Michigan's graduate sociology program tied for 4th with Stanford in USN&WR rankings

Jeff Morenoff makes Reuters' Highly Cited Researchers list for 2014

Next Brown Bag

Monday, Nov 3
Melvin Stephens, Estimating Program Benefits

Yu Xie photo

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data

Publication Abstract

Download PDF versionXie, Yu, Jennie Brand, and Ben Jann. 2011. "Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data." PSC Research Report No. 11-729. February 2011.

Heterogeneous treatment effects are widely recognized but seldom studied empirically in quantitative sociological research. We suspect that lack of accessible statistical methods is one reason why heterogeneous treatment effects are not routinely assessed and reported. In this paper, we discuss a practical approach to studying heterogeneous treatment effects, under the same assumption commonly underlying regression analysis: ignorability. We specifically describe two methods. For the first method (SM-HTE), we begin by estimating propensity scores for the probability of treatment given a set of observed covariates for each unit and construct balanced propensity score strata; we then estimate propensity score stratum-specific average treatment effects and evaluate a trend across the strata-specific treatment effects. For the second method (MS-HTE), we match control units to treated units based on the propensity score and transform the data into treatment-control comparisons at the most elementary level at which such comparisons can be constructed; we then estimate treatment effects as a function of the propensity score by fitting a non-parametric model as a smoothing device. We illustrate the application of the two methods with a concrete empirical example.

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next