Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Bailey and Dynarski cited in piece on why quality education should be a "civil and moral right"

Kalousova and Burgard find credit card debt increases likelihood of foregoing medical care

Bachman says findings on teens' greater materialism, slipping work ethic should be interpreted with caution

Highlights

Arline Geronimus wins Excellence in Research Award from School of Public Health

Yu Xie to give DBASSE's David Lecture April 30, 2013 on "Is American Science in Decline?"

U-M grad programs do well in latest USN&WR "Best" rankings

Sheldon Danziger named president of Russell Sage Foundation

Next Brown Bag



Back in September

Twitter Follow us 
on Twitter 

Use of a Lottery as an Incentive to Increase Survey Participation

Publication Abstract

Anderson, Barbara A., Allan Puur, Brian D. Silver, Henry Soova, and Rein Voormann. 1992. "Use of a Lottery as an Incentive to Increase Survey Participation." PSC Research Report No. 92-242. July 1992.

This paper describes an experiment in which a chance to win a monetary prize was offered in a contacting letter to a randomly selected half of the women in a survey sample, while the prize was not mentioned in the contacting letter sent to the other half. The prize winners were to be chosen at random from participants in the survey. The survey was designed as a validation study of abortion and was conducted in Tallinn, Estonia in April-May 1992. The sample consisted of 360 women who had a registered abortion during 1991. The lottery acted as a strong incentive for the women in the sample to become respondents. It increased by almost 20 points the percentage who returned a postcard verifying their address and arranging an appointment for the interview. Also, among those who returned the postcard, 93% eventually completed the survey, compared to only 62% among those who did not. The effect of the lottery operated entirely through an increase in the chance that the women in the sample would return the postcard. The lottery had no effect on participation by those who had not first returned the postcard. Nonetheless, the lottery substantially reduced the costs of completing the fieldwork without biasing the survey results. There was no evidence of induced self-selection of those with a strong interest in the announced substantive focus of the survey -- health and medical services -- of a deterioration in response validity: those given the incentive were no more or less likely to report accurately that they had had a recent abortion.

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next