Voter Turnout and the Labor Market

A PSC Brown Bag Seminar

Melvin Stephens, Jr
Kerwin Charles (University of Chicago)

Monday, 03-22-2010.   ARCHIVED EVENT

Location: 6050 ISR Thompson St

Using county-level data, and a variety of OLS and TSLS models, we show that better local labor market performance lowers turnout in gubernatorial and Senate elections but has no effect on Presidential turnout. To reconcile these new results, we present a model of expressive voting in which greater labor supply in a good labor market lowers the time agents devote to being politically informed and raises the logistical costs of voting. Various pieces of evidence, including individual fixed effect results from the American National Election Study, are more supportive of the political attentiveness argument than alternative explanations.

Related Material:

[VIDEO]

PSC Brown Bag seminars highlight recent research in population studies and serve as a focal point for building our research community.

Forthcoming . Past . Next

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Shaefer comments on the impact of social safety net on hunger and poverty during the pandemic.

Mehta makes it clear why young people are leading the rise of COVID cases in Michigan: Socializing

More News

Highlights

Frey's Social Science Data Analysis Network, SSDAN wins 2020 MERLOT Sociology Classics Award

Doing COVID-19 research? These data tools can help!

More Highlights


Connect with PSC follow PSC on Twitter Like PSC on Facebook