Counting Defiers

Publication Abstract

PDF Kowalski, Amanda. 2019. "Counting Defiers." PSC Research Report No. 19-893. 3 2019.

The LATE monotonicity assumption of Imbens and Angrist (1994) precludes "defiers," individuals whose treatment always runs counter to the instrument, in the terminology of Balke and Pearl (1993) and Angrist et al. (1996). I allow for defiers in a model with a binary instrument and a binary treatment. The model is explicit about the randomization process that gives rise to the instrument. I use the model to develop estimators of the counts of defiers, always takers, compliers, and never takers. I propose separate versions of the estimators for contexts in which the parameter of the randomization process is unspecified, which I intend for use with natural experiments with virtual random assignment. I present an empirical application that revisits Angrist and Evans (1998), which examines the impact of virtual random assignment of the sex of the first two children on subsequent fertility. I find that subsequent fertility is much more responsive to the sex mix of the first two children when defiers are allowed.

Browse | Search | Next

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Iglesias-Rios discusses dangers of COVID-19 outbreaks among Michigan farm workers

Stern comments on US history of forced sterilization in light of allegations about conditions in ICE custody

Schulenberg finds marijuana use at four decade high among young adults

More News

Highlights

Help Establish Standard Data Collection Protocols for COVID-19 Research

Prescott wins Distinguished University Innovator Award for foundation of Matterhorn online legal tool

More Highlights


Connect with PSC follow PSC on Twitter Like PSC on Facebook