The Past, Present, and Future of Research on Interviewer Effects

The Past, Present, and Future of Research on Interviewer Effects

Publication Abstract

Olson, Kristen, Brady T. West, Jolene D. Smyth, Jennifer Dykema, Allyson L. Holbrook, Frauke Kreuter, Jolene D. Smyth, Jennifer Dykema, an, et al. 2020. "The Past, Present, and Future of Research on Interviewer Effects." In Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

In an increasing number of surveys, interviewers are tasked with collecting blood, saliva, and other biomeasures, and asking survey respondents for consent to link survey data to administrative records. Errors introduced by interviewers can take the form of bias or variance. Early research found that interviewers vary in how they administer survey questions and that their effects were similar to sample clusters in both face-to-face and telephone surveys. Given the nesting of respondents within interviewers, hierarchical or random effects models have long been used for the study of interviewer effects. Multilevel models are flexible and can be used to infer whether interviewer effects differ across subgroups of items, respondents, and interviewers. At the bare minimum, an anonymized interviewer ID variable on data files would allow analysts to estimate interviewer variance components. Additional data on interviewers, extending beyond simply demographics and experience, would facilitate understanding the mechanisms by which interviewers affect survey data.



Browse | Search | Next

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Shaefer comments on the Cares Act impact in negating hardship during COVID-19 pandemic

Heller comments on lasting safety benefit of youth employment programs

More News


Dean Yang's Combatting COVID-19 in Mozambique study releases Round 1 summary report

Help Establish Standard Data Collection Protocols for COVID-19 Research

More Highlights

Connect with PSC follow PSC on Twitter Like PSC on Facebook