Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

U-M's Wolfers on study showing "outright hostility" toward women in economics

Savolainen links antisocial behavior in childhood to disadvantage and poverty in adulthood

Norton et al. put dollar value on relief from chronic pain for Americans age 50+

More News

Highlights

Viewing the eclipse from ISR-Thompson

Paula Fomby to succeed Jennifer Barber as Associate Director of PSC

PSC community celebrates Violet Elder's retirement from PSC

Neal Krause wins GSA's Robert Kleemeier Award

More Highlights

A New Look at the Determinants of Nonnumeric Response to Desired Family Size: The Case of Costa Rica

Publication Abstract

Riley, Ann P., Albert Hermalin, and Luis Rosero-Bixby. 1993. "A New Look at the Determinants of Nonnumeric Response to Desired Family Size: The Case of Costa Rica." Demography, 30(2): 159-74.

High levels of nonresponse or inappropriate response to items are a persistent concern in survey research because those who do not answer may not be representative of the study. This article focues on the factors associated with nonnumeric response. Using the example of questions on desired family size, the authors propose a conceptual framework for studying the level of nonnumeric response to such questions and illustrate how several of these factors come into play by studying variation over time and place. The authors apply their framework to actual data from the Costa Rica Contraceptive Prevalence Survey 1981.

Findings demonstrate the usefulness of the conceptual framework. The article successfully demonstrates that women who give nonnumeric responses often indicate clear preferences regarding past or future fertility in their attitude either about prior births or about current fertility regulation. Measures of cognitive skill and of reproductive control are found to be important determinants of nonnumeric response. Measures of reproductive history are less important; and community and program factors have no statistically significant effects. The authors conclude with recommendations for future research on fertility preferences.

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next