Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Frey on resurgence of the suburbs

Work by Geronimus cited in PBS's '5 important stories'

Schoeni and Freedman summarize the good and bad news on dementia trends among older Americans

More News

Highlights

Celebrating the accomplishments of departing PSC trainees

'ISR Runs for Bob' team at Twinkie Run, 4/22/2018

U-M participants at 2018 PAA Annual Meeting

PDHP invites applications for Faculty Small Grants in support of population science

More Highlights

Next Brown Bag

Mon, May 7, 2018, noon: Student Forum on Educational Inequality

Dirgha J. Ghimire photo

Modifying and Validating the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for Use in Nepal

Publication Abstract

Download PDF versionGhimire, Dirgha J., Stephanie Chardoul, Ronald Kessler, William G. Axinn, and Bishnu Adhikari. 2010. "Modifying and Validating the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for Use in Nepal." PSC Research Report No. 10-706. 6 2010.

This paper describes the translation and validation process of converting the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) V3.0, a widely-used research psychiatric diagnostic interview, into Nepali for use in a planned psychiatric epidemiological survey in Nepal. The CIDI was designed and has been extensively used to assess the prevalence and correlates of mental disorders in general population surveys around the world using fully-structured questions administered by lay interviewers who have no clinical training. Concerns have been raised, though, that standard translation, back-translation, and harmonization procedures are inadequate to produce a culturally valid version of the instrument in non-Western countries. In order to address these concerns, we took a more locally tailored approach in translating the CIDI that incorporated Nepali idioms and cultural understandings of psychiatric symptoms combined with a rigorous psychometric analysis of validation compared to expert medical evaluation. This paper reports on this approach and provides results from both the process and the resulting pilot study of 400 respondents selected to be representative of the Nepalese general population.

Country of focus: Nepal.

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next