Home > Publications . Search All . Browse All . Country . Browse PSC Pubs . PSC Report Series

PSC In The News

RSS Feed icon

Xu et al find lower cognition at midlife for adults born during China's 1959-61 famine

UM's Wolfers on separating deep expertise from partisanship in analyses of economic condtions

Findings by Burgard, Kalousova, and Seefeldt on the mental health impact of job insecurity

More News

Highlights

Apply by Jan 8 for NIA-supported PSC post-doc fellowship, to begin Sept 1, 2018

On Giving Blue Day, help support the next generation through the PSC Alumni Grad Student Support Fund or ISR's Next Gen Fund

Bailey et al. find higher income among children whose parents had access to federal family planning programs in the 1960s and 70s

U-M's campus climate survey results discussed in CHE story

More Highlights

Next Brown Bag

Mon, Jan 22, 2018, noon: Narayan Sastry

Margaret Levenstein photo

Constant Vigilance: Maintaining Cartel Deterrence During the Great Recession

Publication Abstract

Levenstein, Margaret, and V.Y. Suslow. 2010. "Constant Vigilance: Maintaining Cartel Deterrence During the Great Recession." Competition Policy International, 6(2): 145-162.

Antitrust authorities around the world have continued to pursue illegal price-fixing throughout the economic crisis, but have also increasingly granted "inability to pay" reductions in fines While taking ability to pay into account is appropriate, as the overriding policy goal is the promotion of competition, these reductions in fines must be accompanied by other policy changes in order to maintain the expected level of sanction Granting inability to pay requests for reductions in fines is an ex-post decision on the part of antitrust authorities, and yet it clearly has ex-ante incentive implications for cartel formation These fine reductions also have the potential to undermine the legitimacy and credibility of the antitrust authorities, and therefore must be implemented with specific, objective, and transparent criteria To assure the effectiveness of anti-cartel policy, we should design policies that are informed by empirical research Antitrust authorities should be vigilant in restricting communication that facilitates cooperation among competing firms in highly concentrated industries, especially those with a history of collusion They should also monitor the behavior of former cartel members, raising standards for mergers and other cooperative agreements for firms with a history of collusion This paper reviews the implementation of recent cartel "inability-to-pay" reductions in fines and proposes tools for maintaining deterrence without increasing the likelihood of bankruptcy Our recommendations build on our earlier empirical research on the determinants of cartel stability

Country of focus: United States of America.

Browse | Search : All Pubs | Next